Review — Los Cabos

#	Project	Stage	Evidence	Owner	conf.	Units	conf.	Price	conf.	Src
1	Conrad Residences at Oleada	Planned	Official	Parks Hospitality Holdings	official	43	official	—	—	3
2	Rosewood Residences, Old Lighthouse	Planned	Official	Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family)	official	144	official	—	—	3
3	The Residences at St. Regis Los Cabos	Under construction	Official	Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family)	official	74	official	$4.5M – $13.5M+	official	2
4	Waldorf Astoria Los Cabos Pedregal — Residences	Operating	Reported	Walton Street Capital Mexico	trade-press	—	inferred	—	—	2
5	The Cape Residences	Operating	Official	Black Palm (BPBI)	trade-press	32	official	from ~$0.8M	trade-press	2
6	Park Hyatt Los Cabos Residences	Operating	Official	RLH Properties (BMV: RLH)	official	19	official	from $5.475M	official	2
7	Esperanza Private Residences	Operating	Official	Not recorded	inferred	~82	official	—	—	2
8	Four Seasons Residences, Cabo del Sol	Operating	Official	RLH Properties (BMV: RLH)	official	61	official	$7M – $8M+	official	2
9	Soho Residences Los Cabos	Under construction	Official	FibraSOMA (BMV-listed REIT)	official	50	official	—	—	3
10	Montage Residences Los Cabos	Operating	Official	Ohana Real Estate Investors	official	52	official	from $3.95M	official	4
11	Chileno Bay Resort & Residences	Operating	Reported	Discovery Land Company	trade-press	—	inferred	—	—	2
12	The Residences at Solaz	Operating	Reported	Quinta del Golfo de Cortez	trade-press	~7	inferred	—	—	2
13	Las Ventanas al Paraíso — Residences	Operating	Reported	Ty Warner (Ty Inc.)	trade-press	≈30	inferred	to ~$10M (penthouse)	trade-press	2
14	Viceroy Los Cabos — Residences	Operating	Reported	Rodina Group	trade-press	50	trade-press	—	—	1
15	Nobu Residences Los Cabos	Operating	Official	RCD Hotels	trade-press	60	official	—	—	5
16	The Reserve Residences at Zadún	Operating	Official	Grupo Questro	official	27+	official	—	—	2
17	Four Seasons Private Residences	Operating	Official	Costa Palmas	official	—	inferred	$0.7M – $8M+	official	2
18	Amanvari — Aman Residences	Under construction	Official	Costa Palmas	official	~42	trade-press	—	—	2
19	Delano East Cape — Residences	Planned	Reported	Not recorded	inferred	60	trade-press	—	—	1
20	Raffles East Cape — Residences	Planned	Reported	ONE Development Group	trade-press	46	trade-press	—	—	1
21	TROBBU Los Cabos	Under construction	Official	TRATER	official	32	official	from $1,037,000 MXN per fraction	official	3

Flagged fields, by project

1. Conrad Residences at Oleada
- Opening 2027. Architecture by Legorreta, per the residences site.
2. Rosewood Residences, Old Lighthouse
- Pre-construction; no consolidated pricing yet.
3. The Residences at St. Regis Los Cabos
- Unit count differs by source: brand site states 74, a Quivira blog 60.
4. Waldorf Astoria Los Cabos Pedregal — Residences
- Owner "Walton Street Capital Mexico" — trade-press
- Developer "Walton Street Capital Mexico" — trade-press
- Units — inferred
- Owned by Walton Street Capital Mexico; branded-residence unit count not recorded.
5. The Cape Residences
- Owner "Black Palm (BPBI)" — trade-press
- Developer "Black Palm (BPBI)" — trade-press
- Price — trade-press
7. Esperanza Private Residences
- Owner "Not recorded" — inferred
10. Montage Residences Los Cabos
- Thor Urbana co-developed the resort with Ohana; the precise ownership split between them is not published.
11. Chileno Bay Resort & Residences
- Owner "Discovery Land Company" — trade-press
- Developer "Discovery Land Company" — trade-press
- Units — inferred
- Rebranded mid-development: VieVage → Chileno Bay by Auberge.
12. The Residences at Solaz
- Owner "Quinta del Golfo de Cortez" — trade-press
- Developer "Quinta del Golfo de Cortez" — trade-press
- Units — inferred
13. Las Ventanas al Paraíso — Residences
- Owner "Ty Warner (Ty Inc.)" — trade-press
- Units — inferred
- Price — trade-press
14. Viceroy Los Cabos — Residences
- Owner "Rodina Group" — trade-press
- Developer "Rodina Group" — trade-press
- Units — trade-press
15. Nobu Residences Los Cabos
- Owner "RCD Hotels" — trade-press
- Developer "RCD Hotels" — trade-press
- Sold as right-to-use club weeks to 2053, not deeded title.
- Residence-specific siting within Diamante not recorded.
16. The Reserve Residences at Zadún
- Developer "Grupo Questro" — trade-press
- Specific residences developer, distinct from Questro as master developer, not recorded.
17. Four Seasons Private Residences
- Developer "Costa Palmas · Irongate" — trade-press
- Units — inferred
- No consolidated residence count published.
- Casa Blake marina condos are marketed from about $0.7M, well below the community's headline entry.
18. Amanvari — Aman Residences
- Developer "Costa Palmas · Irongate" — trade-press
- Units — trade-press
- No pricing published; unit count ~18 casitas + 24+ residences per trade press.
19. Delano East Cape — Residences
- Owner "Not recorded" — inferred
- Units — trade-press
- Early-stage announcement; exact location not yet recorded. Coordinates approximate.
20. Raffles East Cape — Residences
- Owner "ONE Development Group" — trade-press
- Developer "ONE Development Group" — trade-press
- Units — trade-press
- Developer ONE Development Group ('Estera'); architecture Olson Kundig. Exact East Cape site not yet recorded; opening 2029. Coordinates approximate.
21. TROBBU Los Cabos
- The operator's investment site files the project under Cabo del Este; its own destination page and every stated driving distance place it at Migriño, on the Pacific.

Review

Open questions on this corridor

Where two sources disagree, or where one name might be two companies, this atlas records both readings rather than picking one quietly. 6 open questions, 4 resolved. Entity strings stay separate until a source joins them — a wrong merge is harder to see than a duplicate.

Name clashOpen
The SOMA / FibraSOMA / Sordo Madaleno group is written six ways across this corridor. How many entities is it?
- SOMA · FibraSOMA · Sordo Madaleno
- SOMA · FibraSOMA
- SOMA · Sordo Madaleno (Hyatt license)
- FibraSOMA (BMV-listed REIT)
- Sordo Madaleno
- Sordo Madaleno Design
Distinct roles, deliberately distinct strings
Each string records a different capacity: FibraSOMA is the BMV-listed REIT that owns, SOMA develops, Sordo Madaleno is the architecture practice, and Sordo Madaleno Design does interiors. Collapsing them would credit the REIT with designing buildings.
One group, six labels
All six resolve to the same corporate family, and the near-duplicate scan flags five pairs on every build. Sordo Madaleno also appears as architect on three Riviera Maya projects, so the split now spans corridors and will split the national view.
Name clashOpen
Discovery Land Company is recorded with and without its founder qualifier on the same project.
- Discovery Land Company
- Discovery Land Company (Mike Meldman)
Same company, two strings
Chileno Bay records the owner as Discovery Land Company and the developer as Discovery Land Company (Mike Meldman). No source distinguishes them; this is one company written two ways within a single record.
Low risk, still a split
Unlike the Coppel pair there is no chance these are different entities, so this is a formatting decision rather than a factual one — but it still produces two rows wherever owner strings are counted.
Name clashOpen
Is Irongate a co-developer at Costa Palmas, and should it be its own platform?
- Costa Palmas
- Costa Palmas · Irongate (reported)
- Irongate
Recorded as reported
Both Costa Palmas projects name the developer as Costa Palmas · Irongate (reported), with the owner as Costa Palmas alone. The qualifier marks that the Irongate role is trade-press sourced, not official.
Irongate has no platform entry
Irongate appears only inside a composite developer string, so it holds no reach of its own in the ledger. If the role is confirmed it should become a platform; if not, the composite should collapse to Costa Palmas.
Name clashOpen
Multi-party owner and developer strings joined with a middle dot always match their own members in the duplication scan.
- Costa Palmas · Irongate (reported)
- SOMA · FibraSOMA · Sordo Madaleno
A false positive, not a clash
A joint string necessarily contains each partner's name, so the scan reports a containment match every time. These pairs need no ruling and should not be mistaken for real duplication.
But they do not aggregate
A composite string is not a platform, so joint ventures only reach projects through the separate platform entries for each partner. Where a partner has no platform entry, its involvement is invisible to the ledger.
ScopeOpen
Whether Nobu Residences Los Cabos was ever sold as deeded whole ownership alongside its right-to-use club weeks.
Right-to-use club weeks
The resale market offers 'Annual floating week' interests running to 2053 with RCD membership tiers, which conveys use rather than title to a unit.
sellmytimesharenow.com ↗
No deeded sale recorded
Nobu's own residence collection describes 60 homes and residents welcomed in 2023, but states no purchase or ownership terms, and no whole-ownership sale of a unit is recorded here.
nobuhotels.com ↗
Name clashOpen
Are TRATER and TROBBU Developments the same company?
- TRATER
- TROBBU Developments
One company, two names
The destination pages at trater.mx carry TRATER as the company behind the TROBBU brand; the brand's own investment site names the developer as TROBBU Developments for the same 32 villas.
trobbuinvestments.com ↗
Not established
No page opened names both strings together or states the relationship between them.
Name clashResolved
Are Pueblo Bonito Group and Quinta del Golfo de Cortez the same Coppel ownership?
- Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family)
- Quinta del Golfo de Cortez
- Pueblo Bonito Group
Two distinct lines
Pueblo Bonito Group is the Coppel family hotel group behind the Rosewood and St. Regis residences at Quivira. Quinta del Golfo de Cortez, the owner at Solaz, is a separate Coppel-linked line. They are held apart deliberately.
Surname similarity is not evidence
No source joins them. This pair is the reason the atlas never auto-merges on a shared surname; it is recorded here as the standing precedent rather than as an unanswered question.
Resolved: Kept separate. Two distinct Coppel lines with no source joining them. This is the cautionary case the no-auto-merge rule was written for.
Name clashResolved
Should Pueblo Bonito Group carry the (Coppel family) qualifier in every field, or only where it owns?
- Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family)
- Pueblo Bonito Group
Qualified where it owns
Both projects record the owner as Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family) and the developer as Pueblo Bonito Group. The qualifier names the controlling family, which is the point of the control layer.
One string everywhere
Two strings for one company trips the near-duplicate scan on every build and will read as two entries in a national owner view unless the roll-up normalises the parenthetical.
Resolved: The registry rules it: Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family) is one entity with one canonical name carrying the qualifier, and 'Pueblo Bonito Group' is a ruled alias. Packs reference the entity by id, so the qualifier renders identically in every field. The separate Coppel line at Quinta del Golfo de Cortez remains a distinct entity.
Name clashResolved
RLH Properties is recorded with its ticker qualifier as owner and without it as developer on the same project.
- RLH Properties (BMV: RLH)
- RLH Properties
Same company, two strings
Four Seasons Cabo del Sol records the owner as RLH Properties (BMV: RLH) and the developer as RLH Properties. There is no doubt these are one company; the qualifier names its Mexican Stock Exchange listing.
The ledger is already correct
The platform entry uses the qualified string in both corridors, so the national ledger shows one RLH row. The Riviera Maya pack was aligned to the qualified form in the same pass. Only this one developer field still differs, and it is the last near-duplicate warning that is not a composite-string false positive.
Resolved: The registry rules it: RLH Properties (BMV: RLH) is one entity with one canonical name, and 'RLH Properties' is recorded as a ruled alias. Packs now reference the entity by id, so the ticker qualifier can no longer appear on one field and not another.
Name clashResolved
Should a Montage-flagged project record Montage International or Montage Hotels & Resorts as the operator?
- Montage International
- Montage Hotels & Resorts
Only Montage International is named as a company
Montage International's groundbreaking release describes "Montage International, the hospitality management company founded by Alan J. Fuerstman", which "features the ultra-luxury brand Montage Hotels & Resorts, the contemporary luxury hospitality brand Pendry Hotels & Resorts, Montage Residences, Pendry Residences". The two named brands are described as brands, not as operating companies.
prweb.com ↗
Montage Hotels & Resorts is a collection, and dates from before the parent
The same release describes it as "Founded in 2002, Montage Hotels & Resorts is an artistic collection of distinctive hotels, resorts, and residences", alongside "Pendry Hotels & Resorts, founded in 2014". Both predate the parent structure that now holds them.
prweb.com ↗
The brand axis already carries the distinction
Montage Residences Los Cabos records brand "Montage" and Pendry Residences Punta Mita records brand "Pendry". Recording the brand a second time in the operator field would collapse the gap between operator and operator group rather than fill it.
Resolved: Operator records the company that runs the flag, so all Montage- and Pendry-flagged projects record Montage International, and the operator group is Montage. This matches how the atlas writes every other operating company against its group — Marriott International against Marriott, Rosewood Hotel Group against Rosewood, Aman Group against Aman. Los Cabos previously recorded Montage Hotels & Resorts, a brand string, and now records Montage International, matching Montage Punta Mita and Pendry Punta Mita. The Montage and Pendry brands stay distinguishable in the brand field.