Branded ResidencesRegister

Pacific Tip · Quivira

Rosewood Residences, Old Lighthouse

Planned

The residences

The name licensed to this project and carried on the building. A brand is not a company: it holds no title, builds nothing and runs nothing.
Rosewood
The business the brand comes from — hotel, fashion, design, automotive, restaurant, club, or a developer’s own name.
Hotel
The larger planned community, resort or named development this project sits inside. A standalone building sits in none.
Quivira
How many separately titled homes this project sells, counting every kind it sells. Where it sells more than one kind, each is named and its own count given.
144
The kinds of home offered — villas, condos, penthouses, lots — and how they break down. Not how many, and not what interest is sold.
Turnkey villas + custom 0.7-acre lots
Whether a hotel shares the site, the building is mixed-use, or it is residences only.
Residences only, no hotel
When the project was first made public.
17 Jul 2024
When its residences were first released for sale.
Rosewood's release states only that the first phase of sales was 'scheduled to officially commence in late 2024', a plan; its own residences ownership page carries no dates at all, so no opened page records sales having opened.
When ground was broken on the site.
Rosewood's release and its residences ownership page were each read and state no groundbreaking or construction start.
When the residences were handed over to buyers.
Neither Rosewood's release nor its residences ownership page states any completion or delivery date; the estate is described pre-construction.
4 fields not recorded

What the brand does · What you buy · Price · Handover projected

Not recorded is a statement about this register: no sourced value is held for these. It is never a claim that anyone withheld them.

Who is behind it

The company that runs properties under this project’s brand and sets the standards carried under it. It need not own the name — who owns it is the brand licensor.
Rosewood Hotel Group
The party that promotes the project and carries it through to delivery. May also hold title to part of it — being one does not make it the other.
Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family)
The practice or individual who designed the building.
Manuel Cervantes · Gómez Vázquez Int'l
The practice or individual who designed the interiors.
Studio Lifestyle · Bibiana Huber Díaz
4 fields not recorded

Building manager · Holds title to · Main contractor · Brand licensee

Not recorded is a statement about this register: no sourced value is held for these. It is never a claim that anyone withheld them.

How this project is structuredRosewood's first standalone branded residential community, on land the Coppel family held more than 25 years. Rosewood's July 2024 release scheduled the first phase of sales for late 2024; no opened page records them opening.

Sources

www.rosewoodhotels.com/en/residences/ownership/los-c…
Rosewood — Old Lighthouse, 4,000–10,000 sqft homes
www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rosewood-residences…
Official release — 144 residences, Coppel partnership
robbreport.com/shelter/new-construction/rosewood-res…
Rosewood's first standalone branded community; Coppel held the site 25+ years

See it on the map

2 settled questionsabout this project

Points this record could not settle, with the sources on each side. The question stays visible after the ruling.

Are Pueblo Bonito Group and Quinta del Golfo de Cortez the same Coppel ownership?

Projects
  • Two distinct linesPueblo Bonito Group is the Coppel family hotel group behind the Rosewood and St. Regis residences at Quivira. Quinta del Golfo de Cortez, the owner at Solaz, is a separate Coppel-linked line. They are held apart deliberately.
  • Surname similarity is not evidenceNo source joins them. This pair is the reason this register never auto-merges on a shared surname; it is recorded here as the standing precedent rather than as an unanswered question.

ResolvedKept separate. Two distinct Coppel lines with no source joining them. This is the cautionary case the no-auto-merge rule was written for.

Los Cabos · Name clash · settled

Should Pueblo Bonito Group carry the (Coppel family) qualifier in every field, or only where it owns?

Projects
  • Qualified where it ownsBoth projects record the owner as Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family) and the developer as Pueblo Bonito Group. The qualifier names the controlling family, which is the point of recording ownership.
  • One string everywhereWritten two ways, one company reads as two in a national list of owners.

ResolvedSettled: Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family) is one company record under one full name carrying the qualifier, and 'Pueblo Bonito Group' is recorded as another way of writing it. Each market references the one company record, so the qualifier renders identically in every field. The separate Coppel line at Quinta del Golfo de Cortez remains a distinct entity.

Los Cabos · Name clash · settled