Branded ResidencesRegister

East Cape · Costa Palmas

Four Seasons Private Residences

Operating

The residences

The name licensed to this project and carried on the building. A brand is not a company: it holds no title, builds nothing and runs nothing.
Four Seasons
The business the brand comes from — hotel, fashion, design, automotive, restaurant, club, or a developer’s own name.
Hotel
The larger planned community, resort or named development this project sits inside. A standalone building sits in none.
Costa Palmas
The kinds of home offered — villas, condos, penthouses, lots — and how they break down. Not how many, and not what interest is sold.
Beachfront & golf villas, marina condos, casitas
Whether a hotel shares the site, the building is mixed-use, or it is residences only.
Hotel on site
The published asking range or entry price.
USD 700,000 – 8,000,000+
When the project was first made public.
Four Seasons' May 2019 release announces the resort's debut rather than the project's first disclosure; no opened page states when the residences were made public.
When its residences were first released for sale.
Costa Palmas' own Four Seasons real-estate page sets out residence types and floor plans with no dates, and the Four Seasons debut release carries no sales information.
When ground was broken on the site.
Neither the Four Seasons release nor Costa Palmas' own real-estate page states when construction began.
When the residences were handed over to buyers.
The Four Seasons release records the resort taking reservations from 1 November 2019 and says the private residences would soon be available for short stays, but neither it nor Costa Palmas' own page dates a residence handed to a buyer.
4 fields not recorded

What the brand does · Residences · What you buy · Handover projected

Not recorded is a statement about this register: no sourced value is held for these. It is never a claim that anyone withheld them.

Who is behind it

The company that runs properties under this project’s brand and sets the standards carried under it. It need not own the name — who owns it is the brand licensor.
Four Seasons Hotels Ltd.
The party that promotes the project and carries it through to delivery. May also hold title to part of it — being one does not make it the other.
Costa Palmas · IrongatereportedIrongate is named in trade coverage, not on a primary source.
The practice or individual who designed the building.
Guerin Glass ArchitectsArchitect of the resort.
The practice or individual who designed the interiors.
TAL Studio · Todd-Avery Lenahanreported
4 fields not recorded

Building manager · Holds title to · Main contractor · Brand licensee

Not recorded is a statement about this register: no sourced value is held for these. It is never a claim that anyone withheld them.

How this project is structuredThe Four Seasons resort is operating; residences span several product lines (beachfront, golf, Casa Blake marina condos). Shares the Costa Palmas master plan with Amanvari.

Sources

www.fourseasons.com/residences/private_residences/lo…
Brand — Four Seasons residences, Los Cabos
costapalmas.com/real-estate/four-seasons
Developer — product types; Casa Blake 'from under $700K'
www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/four-seasons-redefi…
22 May 2019Brand release — resort debut, reservations from 1 Nov 2019Accessed 10 Aug 2026
www.rtj2.com/news/first-look-cabos-new-four-seasons-…
A syndicated copy of the Hollywood Reporter first look, naming TAL Studio and Todd-Avery Lenahan as the interior designers; hollywoodreporter.com redirects to a host that does not resolve.Accessed 22 Aug 2026

See it on the map

2 open questionsabout this project

Points this record cannot yet settle, with the sources on each side. Both readings are published rather than one being chosen quietly.

Is Irongate a co-developer at Costa Palmas, and should it hold a credit of its own?

Projects
  • Recorded as reportedThe Costa Palmas projects credit two developers, Costa Palmas and Irongate, and name Costa Palmas alone as owner. "Costa Palmas · Irongate" is how two credits are written out together, not the name of one company.
  • Irongate holds no credit of its ownIrongate holds a developer credit of its own on the Costa Palmas projects and appears in the registers and on its own record page. What no opened source settles is whether the co-developer role is correct: it rests on trade press, and the developer’s own pages name Costa Palmas alone.
Los Cabos · Name clash · open

Whether `SOMA · FibraSOMA · Sordo Madaleno` should exist as a single registry record when its three members each hold their own.

Projects
  • A false positive, not a clashA partnership credits each company separately, and the middle dot is only how they are written out together. One combined record survives on its own, which no project now credits — its three members are each credited individually.
  • But a composite does not join its membersA composite string is one entity record, so a project crediting it does not credit the partners named inside it. Each partner reaches the register only where a project credits it separately, and a partner named nowhere else is invisible to every register.
Los Cabos · Name clash · open