Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family)

Are Pueblo Bonito Group and Quinta del Golfo de Cortez the same Coppel ownership?

• Two distinct lines Pueblo Bonito Group is the Coppel family hotel group behind the Rosewood and St. Regis residences at Quivira. Quinta del Golfo de Cortez, the owner at Solaz, is a separate Coppel-linked line. They are held apart deliberately.
• Surname similarity is not evidence No source joins them. This pair is the reason the atlas never auto-merges on a shared surname; it is recorded here as the standing precedent rather than as an unanswered question.

ResolvedKept separate. Two distinct Coppel lines with no source joining them. This is the cautionary case the no-auto-merge rule was written for.

Should Pueblo Bonito Group carry the (Coppel family) qualifier in every field, or only where it owns?

• Qualified where it owns Both projects record the owner as Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family) and the developer as Pueblo Bonito Group. The qualifier names the controlling family, which is the point of the control layer.
• One string everywhere Two strings for one company trips the near-duplicate scan on every build and will read as two entries in a national owner view unless the roll-up normalises the parenthetical.

ResolvedThe registry rules it: Pueblo Bonito Group (Coppel family) is one entity with one canonical name carrying the qualifier, and 'Pueblo Bonito Group' is a ruled alias. Packs reference the entity by id, so the qualifier renders identically in every field. The separate Coppel line at Quinta del Golfo de Cortez remains a distinct entity.