Branded ResidencesRegister

Master planLos Cabos

Cabo del Sol

3 projects · 3 brands · Golden Market · 130 recorded residences

Los Cabos

3 projects

Brands here

3 brands

Behind the master plan

3 relations

Behind these projects

10 firms and individuals
2 open questionsabout this master plan

Points this record cannot yet settle, with the sources on each side. Both readings are published rather than one being chosen quietly. 1 question has since been settled; each is listed with its ruling.

The SOMA / FibraSOMA / Sordo Madaleno group is written six ways across this market. How many entities is it?

  • Distinct roles, deliberately distinct stringsEach string records a different capacity: FibraSOMA is the BMV-listed REIT that owns, SOMA develops, Sordo Madaleno is the architecture practice, and Sordo Madaleno Design does interiors. Collapsing them would credit the REIT with designing buildings.
  • One group, six labelsAll six resolve to the same corporate family. Sordo Madaleno also appears as architect in the Riviera Maya, so the split spans markets and splits the national view.
Los Cabos · Name clash · open

RLH Properties is recorded with its ticker qualifier as owner and without it as developer on the same project.

  • Same company, two stringsFour Seasons Cabo del Sol records the owner as RLH Properties (BMV: RLH) and the developer as RLH Properties. There is no doubt these are one company; the qualifier names its Mexican Stock Exchange listing.
  • The register is already correctBoth markets now name one company record, whose full name carries the ticker, so the national list shows one RLH entry wherever a project credits it.

ResolvedSettled: RLH Properties (BMV: RLH) is one company record under one full name, and 'RLH Properties' is recorded as another way of writing it. Every market names that one record, so the ticker can no longer appear in one place and not another.

Los Cabos · Name clash · settled

Whether `SOMA · FibraSOMA · Sordo Madaleno` should exist as a single registry record when its three members each hold their own.

  • A false positive, not a clashA partnership credits each company separately, and the middle dot is only how they are written out together. One combined record survives on its own, which no project now credits — its three members are each credited individually.
  • But a composite does not join its membersA composite string is one entity record, so a project crediting it does not credit the partners named inside it. Each partner reaches the register only where a project credits it separately, and a partner named nowhere else is invisible to every register.
Los Cabos · Name clash · open